By Vineeth (Vinny) Gossain and Claudia Teschky There has been a lot of discussion for the past year or more about a “Great Resignation,” the...
By Vineeth (Vinny) Gossain and Claudia Teschky
There has been a lot of discussion for the past year or more about a “Great Resignation,” the fact that many professionals are calling it quits due to early retirement, burnout, stress or simply a desire to find something new and more meaningful in their lives. Academic medicine and health sciences leadership, too, is witnessing a wave of early retirements and resignations as the appeal of key positions diminishes and deans, chairs and others wonder if they want to stay in a field that has dramatically changed over the past few years. Let’s call it the “Great Reflection,” as many leaders in academic medicine are rethinking their careers and giving serious thought to whether they want to continue in roles that are challenging in the current environment.
This has put many academic medical centers in a bind when it comes to retaining and recruiting leadership. As the supply of leadership candidates declines, the demand increases for leaders who can fill very important positions.
There are a number of factors at play which make academic medicine and the health sciences a more challenging environment. For one thing, finances across the industry are extremely tight and there is less funding in general for the academic and research work that many leaders value. In turn, there is pressure for leaders to do more revenue-generating clinical work with fewer resources, which was especially true during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. These physician and nurse leaders are looking outside of academic medicine for work cultures that align with their intrinsic purpose.
Within academic medicine, with reduced resources there is less time available for research and innovation. Academia has long been the center of world-class care delivery, but is losing ground as the hub of innovation. Talented leaders are gaining foundational leadership training in academic centers, but also looking at opportunities beyond to make greater impact in the healthcare system.
For top-notch leaders in all health-related disciplines there is recruiting competition from new health care entities (such as Fortune 500 companies), consultancies, healthcare providers, private equity firms and more. These organizations can offer greater incentives – for example, a nursing leader in a hospital may make twice what a nursing dean would earn. They can also offer avenues for more immediate impact, autonomy and nimbleness.
The result of leaders looking elsewhere has meant that, in academic medicine, executive searches have much smaller candidate pools than in the past. Positions for which there used to be 8 to 10 viable candidates now have 3 to 5 or fewer at the mid-career leadership level.
One way to confront academic medicine’s leadership talent shortage is to retain leaders better. This can be done in several ways:
How can institutions recruit candidates better? Allow us to offer the following suggestions:
Leaders in academic medicine are truly rethinking and reflecting upon their careers and looking for positions that provide more meaning and purpose. To better retain and recruit exceptional leaders, today’s institutions of academic medicine must appeal to these desires.